Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Improved diagnostic accuracy is important in dyspepsia
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITOR
Delaney et al's trial of Helicobacter pylori
testing and endoscopy for dyspepsia in primary care surely misses the point of medical consultations for dyspepsia.1 Most
doctors would view the purpose of a consultation as primarily to make a
diagnosis before starting treatment. If the purpose is to initiate empirical prescribing
these authors seem to advocate this as they conclude that this "is . . . the best
treatment"
the patients might as well go to a pharmacist and treat themselves.
This study is flawed. It uses a screening test for H pylori (Helisal) that has been reported to have sensitivities of only 67-88%, with a specificity of 78-91%. 2 3 The test is therefore not an accurate means of detecting H pylori, which presumably explains why so many ulcers were found in the control patients who were H pylori negative (four out of 48 endoscopies carried out).
Conclusions have been drawn on symptomatic