Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Targets are fine in principle, but unrealistic
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
The United Kingdom's national service framework for cardiovascular disease1 is one year old. It describes an ambitious list of standards, milestones, and performance indicators against which the NHS will be held to account. It requires primary care to identify and institute preventive strategies not only for people with established ischaemic heart disease but also for those with a 30% 10 year cardiovascular risk. In this issue Hippisley-Cox and Pringle report a study of 18 computerised general practices to estimate the workload involved in meeting these expectations (p 269).2 Is it matched by the benefits gained?
Clearly, the increased workload for primary care is huge. In the
absence of additional resources, how should this extra work be
prioritised alongside everything else required of primary care? Apparently there will be more doctors and nurses,1 but
given a global shortage where will they come from in the time frame of
this framework? Without extra
Read all Rapid Responses