Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Simulated surgeries would have advantages
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITOR
McKinley et al present cogent arguments for directly assessing
the consultation competence of general practitioners undergoing
revalidation.1 They identify the required attributes of an
assessment as reliability, validity, acceptability, feasibility, and
educational impact. They do not mention, however, that the methodology
must also be capable of setting a consistent standard for pass/fail
decisions for every candidate.
The model that they offer depends on the judgment of two
observers watching 10 consecutive consultations, a task that they might
undertake 12 times in a year. If the prevalence of insufficient competence was 2% they might encounter it once every four years. How
could they apply a minimum standard reliably, along with their 1000 assessor colleagues? Just 10 randomly presenting cases will be too few
to guarantee an adequate coverage of consultation skills, and in the
absence of standardisation it will be hard to achieve a reliability
score above 0.5. Furthermore, the patients will behave differently
Read all Rapid Responses