Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Analysis of adverse events must result in improvements in care
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITOR
In his editorial on medical errors Alberti mentions studies of
adverse events from Australia and the United States.1 He
then welcomes a paper by Vincent et al2: "Finally, we
now have some British data from London based on retrospective record reviews" (of 1014 patients in two acute hospitals in London).
In 1980 colleagues and I published a detailed audit of adverse events occurring in 2607 inpatients treated by one surgical firm at the Radcliffe Infirmary in 1978.3 Major, moderate, and minor adverse events in adults and children were recorded prospectively, and we made suggestions (which we hoped would be noted by clinicians and administrators) that might encourage wider adoption of this type of investigation so that clinical care might be improved.
In 1990 I wrote an editorial in the BMJ on the findings of
the 1989 national confidential enquiry into perioperative deaths (within 30 days of surgery) among children aged under 11.4 The
Read all Rapid Responses