Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Willem M Ankum a Department of
Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Academic Medical Centre, University of
Amsterdam, PO Box 22700, 1100 DE Amsterdam, Netherlands, b Department of
General Practice, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam
Correspondence to: W M Ankum w.m.ankum@amc.uva.nl
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
In many parts of the Western world there is a strong
preference among gynaecologists to rely on surgical evacuation for the management of miscarriages in the first trimester. Why so many specialists have adopted surgery as the standard procedure seems determined by custom and habit and rooted in history rather than being
an evidence based choice. During the first half of the 20th century the
high rate of infections from retained products of conception with
ensuing mortality from septicaemia
often complications from criminal
attempts to terminate a pregnancy
resulted in the policy of immediate
surgical evacuation whenever a diagnosis of inevitable abortion was
made.1 Today these complications are rare, and their role
in the justification of a universal tendency to perform surgery has
therefore expired.2
Expectant management finds its main protagonists in general
practice, where the process of spontaneous miscarriage is acknowledged more readily as being a well regulated natural
Read all Rapid Responses