Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Did ethics committee consult specialists?
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITOR
Lanyon et al studied genetic factors associated with
osteoarthritis of the hip, but how ethical is it to subject more than
600 healthy participants (siblings of their original cohort) to pelvic
radiography?1 The authors used radiographs only as a
diagnostic tool. Clinical examination using the Harris hip score would
have more accurately obtained the diagnosis with the addition of
information concerning loss of function and disease severity. Examination of the patient would have detected and excluded patients with rheumatoid arthritis.
Despite the use of radiographs in this study, no information
about the morphology of the hip joints was given. It would have been
fascinating to measure the degree of femoral head cover, angle of
acetabular inclination, and femoral shaft offset, which govern the
magnitude and direction of forces, and the degree of pressure
concentration in the joint. Such morphological differences exist between races and are believed to account for
Read all Rapid Responses