Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITOR
I hope that the predicted reduction in unplanned pregnancies and
abortions will result from pharmacy access for emergency contraception,
as described by Harrison-Woolrych et al in their editorial.1 The possibility of risk displacement, however, rendering this move ineffective in the same way as has been postulated for condom use2 makes this far from certain. What is
certain is that the opportunity for detection of sexually transmitted diseases and reduction of risk has been missed.
A tunnel vision approach to reducing unplanned pregnancy may do
nothing to reduce the risk of sexually transmitted diseases and can
increase it.3 Many, if not most, women in need of
emergency contraception will also be at risk of sexually transmitted
diseases. If, in taking a history to explore the need for emergency
contraception, a doctor did not also gently explore the risk of
sexually transmitted diseases and advise the patient appropriately, I
would
Read all Rapid Responses