Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Michael Marmot a International Centre for Health and Society,
Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College
London, London WC1E 6BT, b Trafford Centre for Medical Research, University of
Sussex, Brighton BN19RY
Correspondence to: M Marmot M.Marmot@ucl.ac.uk
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
Much of the debate on health inequalities has centred on
the damage done by poverty. However, evidence suggests that health is
also related to inequality. Firstly, as the Whitehall studies of
British civil servants show, there is a gradient in health among those
who are not poor, indicating that the higher the socioeconomic position, the lower the morbidity and mortality.1-4 Whole
population samples show that this gradient runs right across societies
and that its magnitude varies between societies and over
time.
5 6
Although absolute mortality has been falling in
Britain, inequalities in mortality have increased.
7 8
Secondly, despite the health gradient within societies, there is little
relation between average income (gross domestic product per capita) and
life expectancy in rich countries. This suggests that absolute material
standards are not, in themselves, the key. Thirdly, there is a strong
relation between mortality and income inequalities. People living in
countries with greater income inequality
Read all Rapid Responses
What can you learn from this BMJ paper? Read Leanne Tite's Paper+