Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Diagnostic laparoscopy is often more useful than ultrasonography
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITOR
Douglas et al's trial of ultrasonography in the diagnosis of
acute appendicitis, and the accompanying editorial, highlight the
importance of an accurate diagnosis of acute abdominal pain in the
right iliac fossa and the need to avoid unnecessary
appendicectomy.
1 2
The results indicate that
ultrasonography has little practical value in the diagnosis of acute
appendicitis because of false positive and false negative results and
the inability to identify alternative diagnoses.
Neither article mentioned the increasing use of diagnostic laparoscopy
in these cases. This technique makes an accurate diagnosis clearly;
this is especially useful in female patients of any age and in elderly
men, in whom diagnostic doubt is common. As well as preventing
inappropriate appendicectomy, diagnostic laparoscopy defines the
correct operative intervention if an alternative diagnosis necessitates
surgery. If surgery is not required a definitive management plan is
usually clear. A further advantage of laparoscopy is that if surgeons
Read all Rapid Responses