Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
How quickly can research change practice?
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITOR
The paper by Diggle and Deeks was fast tracked in the hope of
avoiding the five year delay that often occurs between the emergence of
new evidence and a change in practice.1
I think that in this case there has already been major delay. A Medline search quickly produces several papers on this subject. Ipp et al noted that more redness and swelling occurred in children injected in the thigh with a 16 mm needle than with a 25 mm needle.2
The nature of the evidence also needs to be considered. This study used a standardised injection technique, but other techniques are used in practice, and Groswasser et al reported that injection technique is the most important variable in ensuring efficient delivery of intramuscular vaccine.3 Consequently, the injection technique chosen determines the appropriate needle size.
The question of which needle length is preferable has been around for a
long time,