BMJ 2001;322:430 ( 17 February )

Letters

Obstetric intervention among private and public patients in Australia

    Intervention relates more to age than to having private insurance
    Women must have full information when choosing private health insurance for pregnancy

Intervention relates more to age than to having private insurance

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

EDITOR---Roberts et al found that "there are no obvious clinical reasons for intervention rates to be higher in private than in public patients."1 There are clinical reasons.

In private practice, women are often older, are career oriented, and have private insurance because they can afford it. Roberts et al's analysis verifies this. In addition to there being more intervention in the older age group the authors also show that privately insured women have fewer children, and therefore intervention relates more to a woman's age than her private insurance status. Interestingly, privately insured women had more episiotomies (perhaps proactively) and fewer third degree tears.

There is an incremental rise in the risk of intervention with increasing maternal age.2 As older pregnant women are more likely to be insured, Roberts et al's findings are to be expected. Childbirth in older women may reflect a progressive, age related deterioration in myometrial . . . [Full text of this article]
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

Rates for obstetric intervention among private and public patients in Australia: population based descriptive study
Christine L Roberts, Sally Tracy, and Brian Peat
BMJ 2000 321: 137-141. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student BMJ