Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Missing abortion stratification adds to confusion
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITOR
The objective of Nybo Andersen et al's study of fetal loss was
to measure the age related risk of fetal loss "taking into account a
woman's reproductive history."1 To this end the authors
stratified the women according to parity and previous spontaneous
abortions but inexplicably omitted stratification by induced abortions.
Their only reported use of their complete data on induced abortions was
to deduct from the count of fetal loss any miscarriages that occurred
before an intended abortion.
The effect of elective abortion on future reproductive health is
contentious. Some investigators have found statistical associations between induced abortion and subsequent miscarriages and ectopic pregnancies.2 Others have reported that there is no
significant association between abortion and either of these
events.3 Colleagues of the authors at the Danish
Epidemiology Science Centre, using many of the same data, have recently
reported a strong association between induced abortion and subsequent
preterm