Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Conclusion may be flawed by inadequate data
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITOR
Hotopf et al's conclusion that there is an association between
ill health in veterans of the Gulf war and immunisations given during
the deployment may be flawed by inadequate data.
1 2
Before deployment, routine vaccinations are brought up to date and
vaccinations specific to deployment are given. For the Gulf
conflict a vaccination programme against biological warfare agents had
to be implemented
hence the differences between immunisations given before and during deployment. The authors state that personnel received vaccines both before and during deployment, but the results indicate that only 38% of their sample did. We find this proportion to
be surprisingly low. The implication that around a third of the force
received no vaccinations during the deployment or that a similar
proportion had none before deployment is at odds with our review of the
immunisation programme.3
The finding that only some 30% of personnel received cholera vaccine
before
Read all Rapid Responses