BMJ 2001;322:361 ( 10 February )

Letters

Vaccinations as risk factors for ill health in veterans of the Gulf war

    Conclusion may be flawed by inadequate data
    Authors' reply

Conclusion may be flawed by inadequate data

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

EDITOR---Hotopf et al's conclusion that there is an association between ill health in veterans of the Gulf war and immunisations given during the deployment may be flawed by inadequate data. 1 2

Before deployment, routine vaccinations are brought up to date and vaccinations specific to deployment are given. For the Gulf conflict a vaccination programme against biological warfare agents had to be implemented---hence the differences between immunisations given before and during deployment. The authors state that personnel received vaccines both before and during deployment, but the results indicate that only 38% of their sample did. We find this proportion to be surprisingly low. The implication that around a third of the force received no vaccinations during the deployment or that a similar proportion had none before deployment is at odds with our review of the immunisation programme.3

The finding that only some 30% of personnel received cholera vaccine before . . . [Full text of this article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

Role of vaccinations as risk factors for ill health in veterans of the Gulf war: cross sectional study
Matthew Hotopf, Anthony David, Lisa Hull, Khalida Ismail, Catherine Unwin, and Simon Wessely
BMJ 2000 320: 1363-1367. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

gulf veteran`s response
Philip Garner
bmj.com, 11 Feb 2001 [Full text]



Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student 

BMJ