Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Authors' reply to commentary
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITOR
In his commentary on our paper Fine claims that our observations
lack the classic attributes of causality: gradient, strength, and
coherence.1
Firstly, the estimates only just reach conventional significance.
However, the important finding was not the significance of the
estimates for the individual vaccines but the fact that BCG and
diphtheria, pertussis, and tetanus vaccines had opposite effects on
mortality
the difference being strongly significant (P=0.005).
Secondly, the association of diphtheria, pertussis, and tetanus vaccine
with increased mortality could be due to higher vaccination coverage
and higher mortality among children of young mothers. However, as we
stated in our paper, adjustment for background factors had minimal
effect on mortality estimates. Given the low prevalence of young
mothers and their slightly higher vaccine coverage (table 2),
adjustment for maternal age had little effect. Mortality ratios changed
from 1.84 (1.10 to 3.10) to 1.82 (1.08 to 3.07) with one dose of
diphtheria, pertussis,