BMJ 2001;322:302 ( 3 February )

Letters

Improvement in prescribing can be measured only over time

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

EDITOR---Avery et al say that practices with lower prescribing costs prescribe less, use cheaper items, and avoid new and expensive drugs.1 A five year old managing their pocket money could have told us the same basic economic statement. Without some look at clinical outcomes such studies are of little value. If in 10 years Avery et al could tell us that the low prescribers have just the same rate of coronary events, bypass grafts, suicides, osteoporotic hip fractures, and so forth as the high prescribers then they might have made a useful point. Currently, with more and more pressure from our paymasters to raise standards and follow clinical guidelines, some expensive prescribing is inevitable, unless we opt for therapeutic nihilism. That may simply shift the cost of our prescribing budgets into secondary care management. It is cheaper for us to avoid prescribing inhaled steroids, for example, when the cost . . . [Full text of this article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

A prescription for improvement? An observational study to identify how general practices vary in their growth in prescribing costs Commentary: Beware regression to the mean
Anthony J Avery, Sarah Rodgers, Tara Heron, Robert Crombie, David Whynes, Mike Pringle, Darrin Baines, Roland Petchey, and T J Cole
BMJ 2000 321: 276-281. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

Using the General Practice Research Database for meaningful prescribing analyses
Martin Frischer
bmj.com, 15 Feb 2001 [Full text]



Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student 

BMJ