Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Clinical suspicion of diastolic heart failure should rely on more than symptoms of dyspnoea
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITOR
Caruana et al's study focuses on the well established
difficulties in the diagnosis of diastolic heart failure in the community.1 I question the authors' conclusions that most
patients in the community with a diagnosis of diastolic heart failure
have unrelated conditions.
Proposed criteria for the diagnosis of diastolic heart failure require definitive evidence of congestive heart failure by clinical criteria, physical examination, chest radiography, response to diuretics, etc as a starting point. 2 3 The authors do not provide the indications that led the primary physicians to refer the patients for echocardiography; the clinical suspicion of diastolic heart failure should rely on more than symptoms of dyspnoea at rest or on exertion, for which the differential diagnosis is broad.
The authors consider a history of coronary artery disease or
electrocardiographic changes consistent with coronary disease to be an
alternative explanation for the patients' symptoms. In patients with
normal systolic function