BMJ 2001;322:238 ( 27 January )

Letters

What is suspected heart failure with preserved left ventricular systolic function?

    Clinical suspicion of diastolic heart failure should rely on more than symptoms of dyspnoea
    Paper does not provide evidence that diastolic dysfunction is a misdiagnosis
    Measurement of E:A ratio is both insensitive and non-specific
    Author's reply

Clinical suspicion of diastolic heart failure should rely on more than symptoms of dyspnoea

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

EDITOR---Caruana et al's study focuses on the well established difficulties in the diagnosis of diastolic heart failure in the community.1 I question the authors' conclusions that most patients in the community with a diagnosis of diastolic heart failure have unrelated conditions.

Proposed criteria for the diagnosis of diastolic heart failure require definitive evidence of congestive heart failure by clinical criteria, physical examination, chest radiography, response to diuretics, etc as a starting point. 2 3 The authors do not provide the indications that led the primary physicians to refer the patients for echocardiography; the clinical suspicion of diastolic heart failure should rely on more than symptoms of dyspnoea at rest or on exertion, for which the differential diagnosis is broad.

The authors consider a history of coronary artery disease or electrocardiographic changes consistent with coronary disease to be an alternative explanation for the patients' symptoms. In patients with normal systolic function . . . [Full text of this article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?



Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student 

BMJ