Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
what's wrong with significance tests?
what's wrong with significance tests?
Jonathan A C Sterne Department of Social Medicine, University of
Bristol, Bristol BS8 2PR
Correspondence to: J Sterne jonathan.sterne@bristol.ac.uk
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
The findings of medical research are often met with considerable scepticism, even when they have apparently come from studies with sound methodologies that have been subjected to appropriate statistical analysis. This is perhaps particularly the case with respect to epidemiological findings that suggest that some aspect of everyday life is bad for people. Indeed, one recent popular history, the medical journalist James Le Fanu's The Rise and Fall of Modern Medicine, went so far as to suggest that the solution to medicine's ills would be the closure of all departments of epidemiology.1
One contributory factor is that the medical literature shows a
strong tendency to accentuate the positive; positive outcomes are more
likely to be reported than null results.2-4 By this means
alone a host of purely chance findings will be published, as by
conventional reasoning examining 20 associations will produce one
result that is "significant at P=0.05" by chance
Read all Rapid Responses