Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Sally Macintyre a MRC Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, Glasgow G12
8RZ, b UK Cochrane
Centre, NHS Research and Development Programme, Oxford OX2 7LG, c Lancet,
London WC1B 3SL, d BMJ, London WC1H 9JR
Correspondence to: S Macintyre Sally@msoc.mrc.gla.ac.uk
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
Doctors are exhorted to practice evidence based medicine, and the British government says that it wants public policy to be based on evidence.1 We share the government's enthusiasm, but can it become a reality rather than an aspiration? How much do we know about what works, and are researchers, government ministers, and civil servants truly committed to developing and using the best evidence?
We had an opportunity to learn about the realities of evidence based policy making when we were invited in late 1997 to become an "evaluation group" to assist the independent inquiry into inequalities in health.2 Our reflections concern the material submitted and the evaluation process, not the final report.
| Table Removed (Available Only in the Full Text) |
| |
The independent inquiry into inequalities in health |
|---|
In 1997 the minister for public health for England and
Wales, Tessa Jowell, commissioned Donald Acheson, the former chief medical officer for England, to "moderate a Department of Health review of the latest available information on inequalities in health
. . . and
Read all Rapid Responses