BMJ 2001;322:5-6 ( 6 January )

Editorials

"Normal" blood glucose and coronary risk

Dose response effect seems consistent throughout the glycaemic continuum

Papers p 15

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

Although diabetes is a strong risk factor for coronary heart disease, the association between glycaemia within the "normal range" and coronary heart disease has been somewhat controversial.1 A 1979 collaborative report from 15 countries found the risk ratio in the highest versus the lowest centile of glycaemia to range from 0.34 to 6.07 in men from Finland, Denmark, France, the United Kingdom, and the United States.2 In other cohort studies, including Whitehall3 and Framingham,4 there appeared to be a threshold effect, with risk observed only at glucose levels approaching or including current diagnostic criteria for diabetes. There are several possible reasons for these contradictory results, including: the failure to exclude people with diabetes from the cohorts, compatible with a threshold effect; the multifactorial aetiology of coronary heart disease, compatible with confounding; or the large intra-individual variation in glucose (especially postchallenge glucose) values, compatible with misclassification bias.

Glycosylated haemoglobin, an integrated estimate of glucose over . . . [Full text of this article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Related Articles

C reactive protein and acute phase of ischaemic stroke
Mario Di Napoli
BMJ 2001 322: 1605. [Extract] [Full Text]

Glycated haemoglobin, diabetes, and mortality in men in Norfolk cohort of European Prospective Investigation of Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC-Norfolk)
Kay-Tee Khaw, Nicholas Wareham, Robert Luben, Sheila Bingham, Suzy Oakes, Ailsa Welch, and Nicholas Day
BMJ 2001 322: 15. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • John, W G., Noonan, K., Mannan, N., Boucher, B. J (2005). Hypovitaminosis D is associated with reductions in serum apolipoprotein A-I but not with fasting lipids in British Bangladeshis. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 82: 517-522 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • O'Connor, P. J. (2003). Setting evidence-based priorities for diabetes care improvement. Int J Qual Health Care 15: 283-285 [Full text]  
  • Jesudason, D. R., Dunstan, K., Leong, D., Wittert, G. A. (2003). Macrovascular Risk and Diagnostic Criteria for Type 2 Diabetes: Implications for the use of FPG and HbA1c for cost-effective screening. Diabetes Care 26: 485-490 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Timms, P.M., Mannan, N., Hitman, G.A., Noonan, K., Mills, P.G., Syndercombe-court, D., Aganna, E., Price, C.P., Boucher, B.J. (2002). Circulating MMP9, vitamin D and variation in the TIMP-1 response with VDR genotype: mechanisms for inflammatory damage in chronic disorders?. QJM 95: 787-796 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Davidson, M. B. (2002). Counterpoint: The Oral Glucose Tolerance Test Is Superfluous. Diabetes Care 25: 1883-1885 [Full text]  
  • Williams, K. J. (2002). Editorial: The Mystery--and Importance--of Diabetic Atherosclerotic Vascular Disease. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 87: 33-34 [Full text]  
  • Di Napoli, M. (2001). C reactive protein and acute phase of ischaemic stroke. BMJ 322: 1605-1605 [Full text]  
  • Jarrett, R J, Lamb, E., Khaw, K.-T., Wareham, N., Vlassov, V. (2001). Glycated haemoglobin, diabetes, and mortality in men. BMJ 322: 996-996 [Full text]  
  • Pearson, J., Bergenstal, R. (2001). Fine-Tuning Control: Pattern Management Versus Supplementation: View 1: Pattern Management: an Essential Component of Effective Insulin Management. Diabetes Spectr. 14: 75-78 [Abstract] [Full text]  

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

Glucose Reduction and Cardiovascular Risk Factors
Ronald A Cameron
bmj.com, 11 Jan 2001 [Full text]



Student BMJ

Intimate examinations

Israeli students are refusing to perform intimate examinations on anaesthetised women without their informed consent.

www.student.bmj.com

Listen to the latest BMJ Interview