Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
They should allow authors to describe improvement projects so others can learn
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
Today we publish our first quality improvement
report (p 1460).1 It shows how a group from Paris managed
to improve the management of pain in patients after surgery by
switching them early from intravenous to oral acetaminophen. The report
uses a structure (box) that we have copied with permission from the journal Quality in Health Care.2 One of the
best ways to improve your journal
or anything
is to keep scanning
your environment for good ideas and then copy them.
Those who work in quality improvement in health care have a poor
record in publishing their articles. This may be because they are too
busy to publish or because journals won't accept their submissions.
But it might be because reports on improvement projects are hard to
write and because the traditional structure of scientific articles
(IMRAD: introduction, methods, results, and discussion) is unfriendly
to such reports. Structure is
Read all Rapid Responses