Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITOR
Collinson et al audited prognostically important myocardial
damage in patients discharged from the emergency department
a large
and important healthcare problem.1 The commentary by Kennedy touches on several key issues as well as the obvious
limitations of such a study. As Kennedy says, further follow up data on
the seven patients with raised concentrations of troponin would be useful.
Kennedy also touched on the issue of definitions. The seven
missed Mayday patients had myocardial damage but would not satisfy the
definitions of acute myocardial infarction held by the World Health
Organization or the monitoring trends and determinants in
cardiovascular disease (MONICA) study. Collinson et al are, however,
correct to point out that such patients have a less favourable prognosis. Should these classic definitions be reconsidered? The 6% of
discharged patients with troponin T concentrations above 0.1 ng/ml have
a substantial short term mortality and morbidity,2 yet
this can be