Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITOR
Professors Graham Dunn and Brian Everitt have pointed out
to us in a personal communication that a different statistical method would have been more appropriate in our paper on the effects of
multiple vaccines on the health of Gulf war veterans.1 In that paper we assessed the effect of multiple vaccines received either
before or during deployment to the Gulf as two separate exposures. We
found that vaccines received before deployment were not associated with
most of the outcome measures we looked at, whereas vaccines received
during deployment were. We performed the analysis in this way as we
were testing a specific a priori hypothesis based on a theory put
forward by Rook and Zumla.2 However, we did not directly
compare these two exposures.
We have performed a series of further analyses in which we entered the
two separate exposures (vaccines received before deployment and
vaccines received during
Read all Rapid Responses