BMJ 2000;321:730-731 ( 23 September )

Papers

Outcome of pregnancy in diabetic women in northeast England and in Norway, 1994-7

G Hawthorne, consultant physician aL M Irgens, professor bR T Lie, professor of medical statistics b

a Northern Diabetic Pregnancy Survey, Regional Maternity Survey Office, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4AA, b Medical Birth Registry of Norway, Hauletend Hospital, N-5021 Bergen, Norway

Correspondence to: G C Hawthorne gillian.hawthorne@nth.northy.nhs.uk

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

In northeast England, perinatal mortality is five times higher and congenital malformation is four times higher for pregnancies in diabetic women than for those in women who do not have diabetes.1 The same is true in other regions in the United Kingdom, 2 3 but this is not the case in Norway.4 Why is the outcome of pregnancy in diabetic women better in Norway? Does Norway use the same definitions and record the same outcome data as the United Kingdom? If the data are standardised will these differences disappear? If not, what is causing the difference in the outcome of pregnancy in diabetic women?

The methodology for data collection needs to be standardised between the two countries to determine whether differences in outcome are real before looking for explanations in the healthcare systems of the two countries. We compare the outcome of pregnancy in women with diabetes based on prospective population data . . . [Full text of this article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Articles

Retraction of paper on maternal diabetes
Gillian Hawthorne, Lorentz M Irgens, Rolv T Lie, Narve Moe, and Jak Jervell
BMJ 2003 327: 929. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Outcome of pregnancy in diabetic women
Frank Johnstone, Jean Golding, Gillian Hawthorne, L M Irgens, and R T Lie
BMJ 2001 322: 614. [Extract] [Full Text]

Distinguishing the signal in the noise
BMJ 2000 321: 0. [Full Text] [PDF]

Distinguishing the signal in the noise
BMJ 2000 321: 0. [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Diabetes and Pregnancy Group, France, (2003). French Multicentric Survey of Outcome of Pregnancy in Women With Pregestational Diabetes. Diabetes Care 26: 2990-2993 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Smith, R. (2003). When to retract?. BMJ 327: 883-884 [Full text]  
  • Hawthorne, G., Irgens, L. M, Lie, R. T, Moe, N., Jervell, J. (2003). Retraction of paper on maternal diabetes. BMJ 327: 929-929 [Full text]  
  • (2003). Retraction. BMJ 327: 905-905 [Full text]  
  • van den Berghe, G., Wouters, P., Weekers, F., Verwaest, C., Bruyninckx, F., Schetz, M., Vlasselaers, D., Ferdinande, P., Lauwers, P., Bouillon, R. (2001). Intensive Insulin Therapy in Critically Ill Patients. NEJM 345: 1359-1367 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Johnstone, F., Golding, J., Hawthorne, G., Irgens, L M, Lie, R T (2001). Outcome of pregnancy in diabetic women. BMJ 322: 614-614 [Full text]  

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

Attitude is everything!
James S Smeltzer
bmj.com, 26 Sep 2000 [Full text]
Outcome of pregnancy in diabetic women in Northern Europe
Clara Lowy
bmj.com, 13 Oct 2000 [Full text]
Outcome of pregnancy in diabetic women
Frank Johnstone
bmj.com, 22 Nov 2000 [Full text]
Diabetic pregnancy - further studies comparing Norway and Northeast Englanda
Gillian Hawthorne
bmj.com, 26 Jun 2001 [Full text]



Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student 

BMJ