Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Linda Beecham
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
The General Medical Council has sent its governance working group back to the drawing board after some council members thought that it should be more radical in its proposals for restructuring the council.
The group was set up in July after months of complaints from doctors and patients about the council. This culminated in a vote of no confidence in the council "as presently constituted and functioning" at the BMA's annual meeting (8 July, p 69).
The group proposed several options: a council of about 25 members; a modernised council of around 100; a council of 200; and a small board and a large conference. The group favoured the last option.
This envisaged a board of 20 to 25 members, with a third of the board
being lay members. The board, which would be elected by the conference,
would meet 10 to 12 times a year and elect a medical president and a
lay deputy president.