Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Defensive culture of British medicine needs to change
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITOR
It was brave to devote a whole issue to medical
error1
how to recognise, how to investigate, how to
analyse, and how to change systems to improve patient
safety.1 However, we regret that the edition was dominated
by American studies, ignoring the British contribution of confidential
inquiries and analyses of closed claims, which have significantly
improved safety in some well defined areas of medical practice.
In the United States the insurance industry provided the impetus for the study of adverse events,2 and in Australia the government funded a similar study3 because it was considering "no fault" compensation.3 In the United Kingdom, for 25 years the Department of Health has financed all successful claims against NHS hospitals and their staff. As a result the need to take a British study beyond the pilot phase may not be supported.4
Be that as it may, an important issue was not addressed in
Read all Rapid Responses