Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Report provides compelling evidence for transparency about competing interests
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
Five years ago I wrote a critique of the World
Health Organization in the BMJ.1 One of my
sources was a report by an American economist, Richard Tollison, which
tore apart the WHO's budgetary priorities. Tollison's main claim was
that too little of the WHO's money was spent on improving health in
the developing world.2 One statement quoted in the
BMJ ran, "The poorest nations in WHO are interested in
basic public health, and not in the more exotic forays of WHO into the
public health issues of the modern industrialised West."3 What I and the BMJ and its readers
didn't know, because the report didn't say, was that Tollison was in
the pay of British American Tobacco. Nor did we know that such covert
funding of "independent" commentators was just one part of an
elaborate campaign by the tobacco industry to discredit the WHO and
divert money and
Read all Rapid Responses