Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Vigorous, well designed trials are needed
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITOR
Smyth and Hoult ask why the implementation of home treatment has
been "delayed" in the United Kingdom and call for more
"sophisticated evaluations" while continuing the same tired (and
tiresome) polemic masquerading as science that holds up such progress.1 They present a categorical view of home
treatment versus "the rest," where only one of "the 12 features
of an effective home treatment team" (several visits daily) is not
available in some form in routine British mental health practice. How
do Smyth and Hoult know that each of these 12 features is necessary or makes a difference? They do not. The series of studies they quote are
all "black box" trials of complex and often poorly defined experimental services against even more poorly defined control services
(often simply called standard care). To prove effectiveness, carefully
controlled trials that vary only one component are needed. Smyth and
Hoult did not quote our
enigmas and fantasies
Read all Rapid Responses