Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Merit of using risk reduction rather than absolute risk for lipid lowering drugs
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITOR
Our study of whether treatment recommendations for lipid
lowering drugs should be based on absolute coronary risk or risk
reduction1 was accompanied by an editorial by Jackson in
the same issue that warrants further discussion.
The chance of preventing a coronary event is the absolute risk multiplied by the relative risk reduction, but the question is whether the relative risk reduction is equal in patients of all ages. The meta-analysis of the statin trials by LaRosa et al,2 cited as evidence for this by Jackson (together with three hypertension trials), does not render Law et al's meta-analysis of lipid lowering trials invalid3 as LaRosa et al included both primary and secondary prevention trials, assuming that the difference between them relates only to the absolute risk of a further event.
Our study concerned primary prevention, and the two relevant statin
trials in this meta-analysis suggest that age may influence
Read all Rapid Responses
What can you learn from this BMJ paper? Read Leanne Tite's Paper+