Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
Many suspensions are wasteful or unjust. So why is the health department opposing a bill to make suspension procedures fairer, asks Judy Jones
"Criminals who commit serious offences are treated better than suspended doctors," declares the Conservative peer, Baroness Knight of Collingtree. "They can be locked out of their hospitals for years, without knowing what they are meant to have done wrong and without anyone speaking up for them."
A bill being steered through the House of Lords by Lady Knight seeks to remedy the "grave injustices" that she and many others see in the majority of suspensions in England. Many welcome her attempts to reform the cumbersome and labyrinthine procedures that these suspensions often trigger.
Five years ago, the case of Dr Bridget O'Connell prompted a stinging
reprimand of the NHS Executive by the Commons public accounts committee
of MPs (BMJ 1995;311:527). The consultant paediatrician had been
suspended for
Read all Rapid Responses