Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Study was grossly underpowered
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITOR
Steptoe et al draw unreliable conclusions from their randomised
controlled trial of a brief behavioural counselling intervention, led
by nurses, to promote healthy behaviour among adults at increased risk
of coronary heart disease.1 Because of considerable
difficulties in recruitment and retention the study is grossly
underpowered, with only 316 intervention patients and 567 control
patients recruited against the required target of 2000. The authors
cannot therefore report that "brief counselling on the basis of
systematic applications of behavioural principles is more efficacious
in stimulating lifestyle modification than conventional counselling."
The authors have further overinterpreted these unreliable data, since
the only changes in behaviour were self reported reductions in dietary
fat intake and number of cigarettes smoked and increases in physical
activity. Objective measurements, such as body mass index, weight,
blood pressure, and smoking cessation (validated by cotinine assay),
did not change. Given the unreliability of self reporting as a primary
outcome,