BMJ 2000;320:1730 ( 24 June )

Letters

Open access follow up for inflammatory bowel disease

    Would have been better to use t test than Mann-Whitney U test
    Ability of any method of follow up to detect cancer must be stated
    Authors' reply

Would have been better to use t test than Mann-Whitney U test

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

EDITOR---Williams et al undertook a randomised trial to evaluate whether follow up of patients with inflammatory bowel disease is better with open access than with routine appointments.1 They compared primary and secondary care resource use and costs and concluded that open access follow up saves secondary care resources. This conclusion, however, is mistaken because they used inappropriate statistical methods.

Resource use and cost data tend to have highly skewed distributions. As a result, the authors decided that standard parametric statistical methods were not appropriate and assessed significance by using a Mann-Whitney U test. Although this is consistent with conventional statistical guidelines,2 it does not address the question of interest in economic evaluations. As the authors themselves state, "economic analysis is mainly concerned with a comparison of means." Use of a Mann-Whitney U test, however, makes an overall comparison of distributions in the two groups, in terms of both . . . [Full text of this article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Articles

Clarifications: open access follow up for inflammatory bowel disease
J G Williams, D R Cohen, and I T Russell
BMJ 2002 324: 1586. [Extract] [Full Text]

Confidence intervals should be used in reporting trials
Martin Bland
BMJ 2000 321: 1351. [Extract] [Full Text]

Open access follow up for inflammatory bowel disease: pragmatic randomised trial and cost effectiveness study
J G Williams, W Y Cheung, I T Russell, D R Cohen, M Longo, and B Lervy
BMJ 2000 320: 544-548. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Williams, J G, Cohen, D R, Russell, I T (2002). Clarifications: open access follow up for inflammatory bowel disease. BMJ 324: 1586-1586 [Full text]  
  • Hart, A. (2001). Mann-Whitney test is not just a test of medians: differences in spread can be important. BMJ 323: 391-393 [Full text]  
  • Bland, M. (2000). Confidence intervals should be used in reporting trials. BMJ 321: 1351-1351 [Full text]  

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

Confidence intervals should be used in reporting trials
Martin Bland
bmj.com, 23 Jun 2000 [Full text]
Re: Confidence intervals should be used in reporting trials
J G Williams
bmj.com, 6 Jul 2000 [Full text]
Let's Get the Analyses Right
Vance W. Berger, et al.
bmj.com, 23 Jul 2002 [Full text]



Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student 

BMJ