Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Would have been better to use t test than Mann-Whitney U test
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITOR
Williams et al undertook a randomised trial to evaluate whether
follow up of patients with inflammatory bowel disease is better with
open access than with routine appointments.1 They compared
primary and secondary care resource use and costs and concluded that
open access follow up saves secondary care resources. This conclusion,
however, is mistaken because they used inappropriate statistical methods.
Resource use and cost data tend to have highly skewed distributions. As
a result, the authors decided that standard parametric statistical
methods were not appropriate and assessed significance by using a
Mann-Whitney U test. Although this is consistent with conventional
statistical guidelines,2 it does not address the question
of interest in economic evaluations. As the authors themselves state,
"economic analysis is mainly concerned with a comparison of means."
Use of a Mann-Whitney U test, however, makes an overall comparison of
distributions in the two groups, in terms of both
Read all Rapid Responses