Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Twin data support genetic contribution to risk of fracture
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITOR
Kannus et al suggest from prospective data collected on Finnish
twins that genetic factors are of only minor importance in explaining
the population occurrence of osteoporotic fracture, particularly in
women.1
The evidence given to support this is the relatively small excess in concordance in monozygotic twins compared with dizygotic twins. But it is well recognised that twin concordances may be misleading unless the underlying prevalence of a disease is taken into account.2 For example, a small absolute difference in monozygotic compared with dizygotic concordance is more suggestive of a genetic effect for a trait that is relatively rare (such as fracture) than for one that is common. The data thus warrant closer scrutiny.
We have estimated the relative contribution of genetic, shared
environmental, and unique environmental components to the variation in
susceptibility to fracture in these twins from the data provided. The
analysis was conducted using a variance