Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Is seven days of treatment as effective as 10 days?
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITOR
Zwart et al recommend seven days of treatment for streptococcal
infections as opposed to three days.1 For several decades
we were educated to continue penicillin for such cases for no fewer
than 10 days.2 The rationale was that streptococci must be
eradicated to prevent rheumatic fever and that this was achievable only
after 10 days of treatment. This was based on bacteriological,
epidemiological, and clinical observations. The cost of oral penicillin
is almost negligible, and I think we need more assurance to be
persuaded to cut treatment to only seven days. Is there any study that
will prove that treatment for seven days is as effective as treatment
for 10 days for preventing rheumatic fever?
| 1. |
Zwart S, Sachs APE, Ruijs GJHM, Gubbels JW, Hoes AW, de Melker RA.
Penicillin for acute sore throat: randomised double blind trial of seven days versus three days treatment or placebo in adults.
BMJ
2000;
320:
150-154 |
| 2. |
Christie AB.
Streptococcal infections scarlet fever.
In:
Christie AB, ed.
Infectious diseases: epidemiology and clinical practice.
Edinburgh: Livingstone, 1969:983.
|
Antibiotics should not be used for self limiting illnesses
EDITOR The study
I have two concerns about Zwart et al's
article1: firstly, the methodology, and, secondly and more
importantly, that it was conceived at all, in view of the issue of
antibiotic use.