Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Robert Szabo a Faculty of
Medicine, Monash University, Wellington Road, Melbourne 3168, Australia, b Department of
Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Melbourne, Royal Women's
Hospital, 132 Grattan Street, Melbourne 3053, Australia
Correspondence to: R V Short
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
In his otherwise excellent review of the AIDS epidemic in
the 21st century, Fauci presented no new strategies for preventing the
spread of the disease.1 He made no mention of male
circumcision, yet there is now compelling epidemiological evidence from
over 40 studies which shows that male circumcision provides significant protection against HIV infection; circumcised males are two to eight
times less likely to become infected with HIV.2
Furthermore, circumcision also protects against other sexually
transmitted infections, such as syphilis and
gonorrhoea,
3 4
and since people who have a sexually
transmitted infection are two to five times more likely to become
infected with HIV,5 circumcision may be even more
protective. The most dramatic evidence of the protective effect of
circumcision comes from a new study of couples in Uganda who had
discordant HIV status; in this study the woman was HIV positive and her
male partner was not.6 No new infections occurred
Read all Rapid Responses