Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Lynster C T Liaw Royal Victoria Infirmary, Queen Victoria Road,
Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 4LP
Correspondence to:
M G Coulthard malcolm.coulthard@ncl.ac.uk
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
Urinary tract infection is common in childhood. Infants are
most likely to scar and often have non-specific symptoms. Because of
practical difficulties with collecting urine, samples are often not
obtained.1 Most samples are collected by
parents,2 yet nobody has sought parents' views on
available methods. We assessed contamination rates and parents'
opinions of three common methods used at home.
| |
Subject, methods, and results |
|---|
Parents of children aged 1 to 18 months volunteered to
collect urine at home by pads, bags, and clean catch in a randomised order, on one day. The study had ethics committee approval.
Demonstrations and instruction sheets were given. Parents washed their
hands before each procedure and the child's perineum before each
collection. Pads (Newcastle sterile urine collection packs, Ontex UK,
Corby) were placed inside the nappy and checked every 10 minutes until wet (but not soiled), then urine aspirated with a syringe. Bags (Hollister U-Bag, Hollister, Libertyville, IL) were applied and inspected every
Read all Rapid Responses