BMJ 2000;320:1022-1023 ( 15 April )

Editorials

What's so great about collaboration?

We need more evidence and less rhetoric

General practice pp   1038 , 1043 , 1048 , 1053

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

A recent white paper on the NHS strongly recommended improved teamwork between professionals.1 On what basis? How well do nurses and doctors collaborate? Does it matter to anyone? And if it matters, can it be improved? The short answer to all of these questions is: We don't know.

The modern concern with interactions between doctors and nurses began with an opinion piece in a psychiatric journal in 1967. It likened the relationship to a game, a power struggle. The two professions were occupying the same patient care "space," but they communicated indirectly and manipulatively, with little warmth or mutual support---like a bad marriage.2

One response has been to reallocate tasks between the professions, and this week's journal reports several studies of such substitution. They contribute to the growing literature on the success of specialisation and delegation as strategies for avoiding the problems of collaboration.

The other response has emphasised . . . [Full text of this article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Articles

Nurse management of patients with minor illnesses in general practice: multicentre, randomised controlled trial
Chau Shum, Ann Humphreys, David Wheeler, Mary-Ann Cochrane, See Skoda, and Sarah Clement
BMJ 2000 320: 1038-1043. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Randomised controlled trial of nurse practitioner versus general practitioner care for patients requesting "same day" consultations in primary care
Paul Kinnersley, Elizabeth Anderson, Kate Parry, John Clement, Luke Archard, Pat Turton, Andrew Stainthorpe, Aileen Fraser, Chris C Butler, and Chris Rogers
BMJ 2000 320: 1043-1048. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Randomised controlled trial comparing cost effectiveness of general practitioners and nurse practitioners in primary care
P Venning, A Durie, M Roland, C Roberts, and B Leese
BMJ 2000 320: 1048-1053. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Cost analysis of nurse telephone consultation in out of hours primary care: evidence from a randomised controlled trial
Val Lattimer, Franco Sassi, Steve George, Michael Moore, Joanne Turnbull, Mark Mullee, and Helen Smith
BMJ 2000 320: 1053-1057. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Soultatou, P., Duncan, P. (2009). Exploring the reality of applied partnerships: The case of the Greek school health education curriculum. Health Education Journal 68: 34-43 [Abstract]  
  • Hall, C., Slembrouck, S. (2009). Professional Categorization, Risk Management and Inter-Agency Communication in Public Inquiries into Disastrous Outcomes. Br J Soc Work 39: 280-298 [Abstract] [Full text]  



Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student 

BMJ