Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
All encompassing study is needed
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITOR
Preclik et al reported an incidence of 65% peristomal
infection in their control group.1 This is considerably
higher than in previous studies, where rates vary from 19% to
29.4%.2-4 This discordance can be explained by
considering the indications for gastrostomy insertion. This feeding
method is used in five broad categories of patients
cerebrovascular
disease, neurodegenerative conditions, malignancy (primarily
oropharyngeal or oesophageal), dementia with anorexia, and head
injuries. In the previous studies malignancy represented
14.8-21.1%,2-4 whereas in Preclik's cohort it is 65%.
Previous studies have implied that patients with underlying malignancy
are more susceptible to peristomal infection.2 This may
explain the high infection rate in the controls of this study and
therefore the benefit of antibiotics in this particular patient subgroup. This, however, cannot necessarily be extrapolated to other
indications for gastrostomy insertion. The British Society of
Gastroenterology has indicated that this is an area requiring further
evaluation.5 We