Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Charles Vincent a Clinical Risk Unit, Department of Psychology,
University College London, London WC1E 6BT, b Department of Psychology,
School of Health and Life Sciences, University of Aston, Birmingham B4 7ET, c North West London Hospitals NHS Trust, Harrow HA1 3UJ, d Winchester and Eastleigh Healthcare NHS Trust, Winchester SO22
5DG, e Bromley Hospitals NHS Trust, Orpington BR6 8ND, f St Michael's Hospital, United Bristol Healthcare NHS
Trust, Bristol BS2 8EG
Correspondence to: C Vincent c.vincent@ucl.ac.uk
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
Why do things go wrong? Human error is routinely blamed for disasters in the air, on the railways, in complex surgery, and in health care generally. However, quick judgments and routine assignment of blame obscure a more complex truth. The identification of an obvious departure from good practice is usually only the first step of an investigation. Although a particular action or omission may be the immediate cause of an incident, closer analysis usually reveals a series of events and departures from safe practice, each influenced by the working environment and the wider organisational context. This more complex picture is gaining acceptance in health care, 1 2 but it is seldom put into practice in the investigation of actual incidents.
| Table Removed (Available Only in the Full Text) |
The Clinical Risk Unit has developed a process of investigation and
analysis of adverse events for use by researchers.3-7 Two
years ago a collaborative research group was formed between the unit
and
Read all Rapid Responses