Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
We must question the basis of the guidelines themselves
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
The Hampshire depression project, published recently, was a large well designed randomised controlled study of teaching practitioners about the recognition and management of depression and using patient improvement as the outcome measure. Its results were disappointingly negative, failing to show any increase in recognition or patient recovery rates.1 These findings herald the need for a major change in thinking about improving the management of depression in primary care.
Through the 1990s educational initiatives have been mounted to
implement expert guidelines on depression
based on the promising results of a study of educating 18 general practitioners in
Gotland.2 A two day course on recognising and managing
depression given by psychiatrists was followed by increased
antidepressant prescribing and decreased use of tranquillisers.
Admissions for depression and the suicide rate both went down. The
costs of the exercise were only 0.5% of the savings on admissions.
Subsequently, consensus guidelines on recognising and managing
depression
Read all Rapid Responses