Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Applying evidence on small effects is hard; variations are probably inevitable
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
The liberal use of antibiotics for sore throats is
increasingly frowned on.1 There are three reasons why a
clinician might use antibiotics for sore throat: to reduce the risk of
complications, to shorten (or reduce the severity of) symptoms, and
because of factors related to the consultation (perceived patient
demand, ways of terminating the consultation, and so on). Nearly 30 years ago Howie showed a huge variation in different general
practitioners' use of antibiotics for sore throat.2 Have
general practitioners been thirsting for information on which to base
their management? The notion that summarising evidence about an area of
care will result in a sort of regulation of doctors' management
appears to be naive. A Cochrane review summarising the advantages of
antibiotics for sore throat has been available for several
years.3 But there is nothing to suggest that there is less
variation in practice. General practitioners do not access evidence
based
Read all Rapid Responses