Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITOR
Edejer observes that North-South research collaboration is
plagued by differing interpretations of ethical standards of doing
research in developing countries, an example being the controversy over
the Bangkok trial of short course zidovudine for perinatal transmission
of HIV-1.1
One aspect of this controversy concerned the standard of care offered to patients participating in the study: should it be the best current treatment in the country of the sponsoring institution or the best local treatment? Médecins sans Frontières provides primary health care to patients with AIDS in Thailand and has reported that for one patient participating in the Bangkok trial no treatment of her symptomatic HIV infection was offered by the study hospital.2 It seems that neither side in the ethical debate was in touch with the real situation.
Two key documents to be considered are the Declaration of Helsinki and
a set of guidelines developed by the Council