BMJ 1999;319:1447-1448 ( 4 December )

Editorials

Rigorous assessment of palliative care revisited

Wisdom and compassion are needed when evidence is lacking

General practice p   1472

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

In 1994 McWhinney and colleagues reported the failure of an attempt to assess a palliative care home support team using a randomised controlled trial.¹ Problems included attrition of study subjects because of early death and difficulties with recruitment, consent to randomisation, data collection, and timing of outcome assessment. In an accompanying editorial McQuay and Moore argued that assessment of palliative care packages by randomised trials remained mandatory despite these difficulties.² Skating around the ethical problems of randomisation, they restated the evidence movement's demand for proof of effectiveness. Five years down the line, are we any further forward?

Smeenk et al reported a systematic review of the effectiveness of home care programmes for patients with incurable cancer in 1998, finding nine prospective controlled studies (five randomised) which they judged methodologically adequate.³ Eight of the nine studies were from the United States; methodological quality was rated as moderate overall; and, though positive influences on . . . [Full text of this article]

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    StumbleUpon    Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Articles

Assessing palliative care is difficult

Chris Salisbury and Nick Bosanquet
BMJ 2000 320: 942. [Extract] [Full Text]

Places to die and sleep, and "the forces of conservatism"
BMJ 1999 319: 0. [Full Text] [PDF]

Places to die and sleep, and "the forces of conservatism"
BMJ 1999 319: 0. [Full Text] [PDF]

Learning from the NHS

Jennifer Dixon and Alex Preker
BMJ 1999 319: 1449-1450. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Does hospital at home for palliative care facilitate death at home? Randomised controlled trial

Gunn E Grande, Chris J Todd, Stephen I G Barclay, and Morag C Farquhar
BMJ 1999 319: 1472-1475. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

• O'Callaghan, C. (2009). Objectivist and Constructivist Music Therapy Research in Oncology and Palliative Care: An Overview and Reflection. Music and Medicine 1: 41-60 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Meeks, T. W., Jeste, D. V. (2009). Neurobiology of Wisdom: A Literature Overview. Arch Gen Psychiatry 66: 355-365 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Keeley, P W (2008). Improving the evidence base in palliative medicine: a moral imperative. J. Med. Ethics 34: 757-760 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Keeley, P. W., Waterhouse, E. T., Noble, S. I.R. (2007). The evidence base of palliative medicine: is inpatient palliative medicine evidence-based?. Palliat Med 21: 623-627 [Abstract]  
• Aoun, S. M, Kristjanson, L. J (2005). Challenging the framework for evidence in palliative care research. Palliat Med 19: 461-465 [Abstract]  
• Keeley, P. (2004). Making the GRADE. Palliat Med 18: 675-676  
• Keeley, P. W (2003). Clinical guidelines. Palliat Med 17: 368-374 [Abstract]  
• Bennett, M., Ahmedzai, S. H. (2000). Evidence-based clinical guidelines for palliative care: the work of the APM Science Committee. Palliat Med 14: 453-454  
• Salisbury, C., Bosanquet, N. (2000). Assessing palliative care is difficult. BMJ 320: 942-942 [Full text]  

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

Palliative care editorial

Chris Salisbury, et al.
bmj.com, 13 Dec 1999 [Full text]

Online poll

Find out more>>