Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITOR
In the commentary on Uhari et al's trial of xylitol chewing gum
in the prevention of acute otitis media White raised the problem of the
ethical aspects of the study protocol because of the possible risk of
caries in the control group.1 The objective of the trial
was to see if regular use of xylitol chewing gum for two months would
result in a reduction in the growth of Streptococcus pneumoniae causing acute otitis media, as had been the case in vitro. Children in the control group used sucrose chewing gum. The
result was that the occurrence of acute otitis media was reduced by
40% but not the carriage rate of S pneumoniae.
The dental healthcare system in Finland is such that a double blind,
retrospective examination of the development of caries in the children
who participated in the trial was possible. Dental records of each
child involved