Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITOR
The debate about the dangerousness of discharged
psychiatric patients is interesting.
1 2
In public debate
(and sometimes also among professionals) it is often claimed that
discharged patients are responsible for a substantial number of
violent assaults in society. This is sometimes held as a reason for
more custodial, institutionalised treatment.
In 1987 Wistedt and I studied the possibility of using a prediction of
the likelihood of violence, assessed at discharge from involuntary
psychiatric care, as a means of reducing rates of violence in Swedish
society.3 Our calculations showed that, at most, 100 serious assaults a year in Sweden were committed by patients who had
been discharged during the previous year from involuntary psychiatric
treatment
that is, less than 1% of all patients discharged. Trieman
et al estimated that 2% of their population of discharged patients
committed serious violent acts within the five years after discharge
(that is, 0.4% a year).2
When