Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
W Dale Dauphinee Medical Council of Canada, PB Box 8234, Station T,
Ottawa, ON, Canada K1G 3H7
dauphine@mcc.ca
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
All approaches to revalidation ask doctors to prove their
continuing competence to practise. This paper considers developments in
Canada from two perspectives: what the profession and its regulatory bodies are doing to meet the challenge of maintaining doctors' performance, and the methods of assessment the regulatory bodies and
agencies are using to address this issue. The two perspectives have led
to two primary pathways: assessment related to practice activities but
linked to an educational or enhancement feedback by the licensing
bodies, and strategies emphasising the maintenance of good learning
practices by the certifying bodies. The term revalidation is not widely
used in Canada, but it can be defined as enforcing standards of
practice in the medical workplace by direct measures of doctors' performance.
| |
Methods |
|---|
We reviewed the peer reviewed literature and publicly available
documents describing either existing or proposed steps for the
revalidation of medical licensure or certification and the maintenance