BMJ 1999;319:914-915 ( 2 October )

Education and debate

Economics notes

Discounting

David J Torgerson, senior research fellow a James Raftery, professor b

a Department of Health Studies and Centre for Health Economics, University of York, York YO1 5DD, b Health Economics Facility, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2RT
The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

Until recently it has been common practice in economic evaluations to "discount" both future costs and benefits, but recently discounting benefits has become controversial. Discounting makes current costs and benefits worth more than those occurring in the future because there is an opportunity cost to spending money now and there is desire to enjoy benefits now rather than in the future. The reason why current spending incurs an opportunity cost relative to delayed spending is that a monetary investment yields a real rate of return and therefore there is a cost to spending money in the present.

For example, if £100 were invested with a nominal return of 10%, in one year's time it would be worth £110; if inflation was 4% this would result in a real return of £6 on every £100 invested. If for some reason £100 of healthcare spending were delayed for one year then (assuming . . . [Full text of this article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

Need for differential discounting of costs and health effects in cost effectiveness analyses
Werner B F Brouwer, Louis W Niessen, Maarten J Postma, and Frans F H Rutten
BMJ 2005 331: 446-448. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Soares, M., Dumville, J. C (2008). Critical appraisal of cost-effectiveness and cost-utility studies in health care. Evid. Based Nurs. 11: 99-102 [Full text]  
  • English, P (2006). Should universal hepatitis B immunisation be introduced in the UK?. Arch. Dis. Child. 91: 286-289 [Full text]  
  • Brouwer, W. B F, Niessen, L. W, Postma, M. J, Rutten, F. F H (2005). Need for differential discounting of costs and health effects in cost effectiveness analyses. BMJ 331: 446-448 [Full text]  
  • Mangtani, P., Roberts, J. A, Hall, A. J, Cutts, F. T (2005). An economic analysis of a pneumococcal vaccine programme in people aged over 64 years in a developed country setting. Int J Epidemiol 34: 565-574 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Renehan, A. G, O'Dwyer, S. T, Whynes, D. K (2004). Cost effectiveness analysis of intensive versus conventional follow up after curative resection for colorectal cancer. BMJ 328: 81- [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Summerfield, A. Q., Marshall, D. H., Barton, G. R., Bloor, K. E. (2002). A Cost-Utility Scenario Analysis of Bilateral Cochlear Implantation. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 128: 1255-1262 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Cunningham, S. J. (2001). An Introduction to Economic Evaluation of Health Care. J. Orthod. 28: 246-250 [Abstract] [Full text]  

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

Discounting misses the point
Chris Borthwick
bmj.com, 1 Oct 1999 [Full text]
Discounting health outcomes
David Wonderling
bmj.com, 6 Oct 1999 [Full text]



Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student 

BMJ