Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
A simple test may make it easier to study whether screening is worthwhile
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
Gestational diabetes mellitus is a concept that arouses considerable controversy. It is defined as "carbohydrate intolerance of varying degrees of severity with onset or first recognition during pregnancy."1 Rather than predicting the development of diabetes later in life, as proposed originally,2 the main purpose of identifying gestational diabetes is to detect women at risk of adverse perinatal outcomes, such as macrosomia, neonatal metabolic abnormalities, birth trauma, and caesarean section. 1 3 4 Evidence of the effectiveness of universal screening for gestational diabetes on these outcomes is still lacking.5 However, recent randomised studies indicate that women who are intensively managed can achieve near normal rates of macrosomia and neonatal hypoglycaemia.5-7
Those who do not favour screening for gestational diabetes claim, among
other things, that the current screening and diagnostic strategies are
cumbersome. In this issue of the BMJ Perucchini et al
propose a protocol which could counter this argument: they suggest
using a fasting
Read all Rapid Responses