BMJ 1999;319:780-782 ( 18 September )

Education and debate

What do we mean by partnership in making decisions about treatment?

Cathy Charles, associate professor a Tim Whelan, associate professor b Amiram Gafni, professor a

a Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada L8N 3Z5, b Department of Medicine, McMaster University

Correspondence to: C Charles charlesc@fhs.mcmaster.ca

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

For many decades, the dominant approach to making decisions about treatment in the medical encounter has been one of paternalism.1-7 In recent years this model has been challenged by doctors, patients, medical ethicists, and researchers who advocate more of a partnership relation between doctors and patients. 2 8-13 The reasons for this challenge have been described in detail elsewhere and include the rise of consumerism and the notion of consumer sovereignty in healthcare decision making; the women's movement with its emphasis on challenging medical authority; the passage of legislation focusing on patients' rights in health care; and small area variations in doctors' practice patterns that seem unrelated to differences in health status.7 Though the first three factors are seen as either contributors to or facilitators of patients' participation in making decisions about health care, the fourth highlights the imprecision or the "art" of medical care14: patients with similar clinical problems may . . . [Full text of this article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Articles

Two decision aids for mode of delivery among women with previous caesarean section: randomised controlled trial
Alan A Montgomery, Clare L Emmett, Tom Fahey, Claire Jones, Ian Ricketts, Roshni R Patel, Tim J Peters, Deirdre J Murphy DiAMOND Study Group
BMJ 2007 334: 1305. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Take your partners for the dance
BMJ 1999 319: 0. [Full Text] [PDF]

Take your partners for the dance
BMJ 1999 319: 0. [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Knapp, C, Huang, I., Madden, V, Vadaparampil, S, Quinn, G, Shenkman, E (2009). An evaluation of two decision-making scales for children with life-limiting illnesses. Palliat Med 23: 518-525 [Abstract]  
  • White, D. B., Evans, L. R., Bautista, C. A., Luce, J. M., Lo, B. (2009). Are Physicians' Recommendations to Limit Life Support Beneficial or Burdensome?: Bringing Empirical Data to the Debate. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 180: 320-325 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Curtis, J. R., White, D. B. (2008). Practical Guidance for Evidence-Based ICU Family Conferences. Chest 134: 835-843 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Haward, M. F., Murphy, R. O., Lorenz, J. M. (2008). Message Framing and Perinatal Decisions. Pediatrics 122: 109-118 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Hudak, P. L., Frankel, R. M., Braddock, C. III, Nisenbaum, R., Luca, P., McKeever, C., Levinson, W. (2008). Do Patients' Communication Behaviors Provide Insight into Their Preferences for Participation in Decision Making?. Med Decis Making 28: 385-393 [Abstract]  
  • Holmes-Rovner, M., Nelson, W. L., Pignone, M., Elwyn, G., Rovner, D. R., O'Connor, A. M., Coulter, A., Correa-de-Araujo, R. (2007). Are Patient Decision Aids the Best Way to Improve Clinical Decision Making? Report of the IPDAS Symposium. Med Decis Making 27: 599-608 [Abstract]  
  • Moumjid, N., Gafni, A., Bremond, A., Carrere, M.-O. (2007). Shared Decision Making in the Medical Encounter: Are We All Talking about the Same Thing?. Med Decis Making 27: 539-546 [Abstract]  
  • Barnato, A. E., Llewellyn-Thomas, H. A., Peters, E. M., Siminoff, L., Collins, E. D., Barry, M. J. (2007). Communication and Decision Making in Cancer Care: Setting Research Priorities for Decision Support/Patients' Decision Aids. Med Decis Making 27: 626-634 [Abstract]  
  • Montgomery, A. A, Emmett, C. L, Fahey, T., Jones, C., Ricketts, I., Patel, R. R, Peters, T. J, Murphy, D. J, DiAMOND Study Group, (2007). Two decision aids for mode of delivery among women with previous caesarean section: randomised controlled trial. BMJ 334: 1305-1305 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • White, D. B., Braddock, C. H. III, Bereknyei, S., Curtis, J. R. (2007). Toward Shared Decision Making at the End of Life in Intensive Care Units: Opportunities for Improvement. Arch Intern Med 167: 461-467 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Wexler, I. D., Johannesson, M., Edenborough, F. P., Sufian, B. S., Kerem, E. (2007). Pregnancy and Chronic Progressive Pulmonary Disease. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 175: 300-305 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Binymin, K. A., Phillips, K. (2007). "To do no harm". Rheumatology (Oxford) 46: 368-370 [Full text]  
  • Thomson, J., Schofield, P., Mileshkin, L., Agalianos, E., Savulescu, J., Zalcberg, J., Jefford, M. (2006). Do oncologists discuss expensive anti-cancer drugs with their patients?. Ann Oncol 17: 702-708 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Creer, T. L., Holroyd, K. A. (2006). Self-management of chronic conditions: the legacy of Sir William Osler. Chronic Illness 2: 7-14  
  • Guyatt, G., Vist, G., Falck-Ytter, Y., Kunz, R., Magrini, N., Schunemann, H. (2006). An emerging consensus on grading recommendations?. Evid. Based Med. 11: 2-4 [Full text]  
  • Whitney, S. N., Ethier, A. M., Fruge, E., Berg, S., McCullough, L. B., Hockenberry, M. (2006). Decision Making in Pediatric Oncology: Who Should Take the Lead? The Decisional Priority in Pediatric Oncology Model. JCO 24: 160-165 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Thomson, R, Murtagh, M, Khaw, F-M (2005). Tensions in public health policy: patient engagement, evidence-based public health and health inequalities. Qual Saf Health Care 14: 398-400 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Bastek, T. K., Richardson, D. K., Zupancic, J. A.F., Burns, J. P. (2005). Prenatal Consultation Practices at the Border of Viability: A Regional Survey. Pediatrics 116: 407-413 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Stewart, R., Hargreaves, K., Oliver, S. (2005). Evidence informed policy making for health communication. Health Education Journal 64: 120-128 [Abstract]  
  • Chaudhry, S. I., Krumholz, H. M., Foody, J. M. (2004). Systolic Hypertension in Older Persons. JAMA 292: 1074-1080 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Goodacre, L. J., Goodacre, J. A. (2004). Factors influencing the beliefs of patients with rheumatoid arthritis regarding disease-modifying medication. Rheumatology (Oxford) 43: 583-586 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Partridge, A. H., Hackett, N., Blood, E., Gelman, R., Joffe, S., Bauer-Wu, S., Knudsen, K., Emmons, K., Collyar, D., Schilsky, R. L., Winer, E. P. (2004). Oncology Physician and Nurse Practices and Attitudes Regarding Offering Clinical Trial Results To Study Participants. JNCI J Natl Cancer Inst 96: 629-632 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Douglass, J, Goeman, D, Aroni, R, Thien, F, Abramson, M, Stewart, K, Sawyer, S. (2004). Choosing to attend an asthma doctor: a qualitative study in adults attending emergency departments. Fam Pract 21: 166-172 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Cohen, H., Britten, N. (2003). Who decides about prostate cancer treatment? A qualitative study. Fam Pract 20: 724-729 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Bridson, J., Hammond, C., Leach, A., Chester, M. R (2003). Making consent patient centred. BMJ 327: 1159-1161 [Full text]  
  • Thompson, T., Barbour, R., Schwartz, L. (2003). Adherence to advance directives in critical care decision making: vignette study. BMJ 327: 1011- [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Thompson, T. D., Barbour, R. S, Schwartz, L. (2003). Health professionals' views on advance directives: a qualitative interdisciplinary study. Palliat Med 17: 403-409 [Abstract]  
  • Daghio, M., Ciardullo, A., Cadioli, T, Delvecchio, C, Menna, A, Voci, C, Guidetti, P, Magrini, N, Liberati, A (2003). GPs' satisfaction with the doctor-patient encounter: findings from a community-based survey. Fam Pract 20: 283-288 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Joffe, S, Manocchia, M, Weeks, J C, Cleary, P D (2003). What do patients value in their hospital care? An empirical perspective on autonomy centred bioethics. J. Med. Ethics 29: 103-108 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Norris, A. C. (2002). Current trends and challenges in health informatics. Health Informatics Journal 8: 205-213 [Abstract]  
  • Zupancic, J A F, Kirpalani, H, Barrett, J, Stewart, S, Gafni, A, Streiner, D, Beecroft, M L, Smith, P (2002). Characterising doctor-parent communication in counselling for impending preterm delivery. Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed. 87: F113-117 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Partridge, A. H., Winer, E. P. (2002). Informing Clinical Trial Participants About Study Results. JAMA 288: 363-365 [Full text]  
  • Hudak, P. L., Clark, J. P., Hawker, G. A., Coyte, P. C., Mahomed, N. N., Kreder, H. J., Wright, J. G. (2002). "You're Perfect for the Procedure! Why Don't You Want It?" Elderly Arthritis Patients' Unwillingness to Consider Total Joint Arthroplasty Surgery: A Qualitative Study. Med Decis Making 22: 272-278 [Abstract]  
  • Aoun, S., Donovan, R. J., Johnson, L., Egger, G. (2002). Preventive Care in the Context of Men's Health. J Health Psychol 7: 243-252 [Abstract]  
  • Levine, M., Whelan, T. (2001). Decision-Making Process--Communicating Risk/Benefits: Is There an Ideal Technique?. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 2001: 143-145 [Full text]  
  • Sowden, A J, Forbes, C, Entwistle, V, Watt, I (2001). Informing, communicating and sharing decisions with people who have cancer. Qual Saf Health Care 10: 193-196 [Full text]  
  • Robinson, A, Thomson, R (2001). Variability in patient preferences for participating in medical decision making: implication for the use of decision support tools. Qual Saf Health Care 10: i34-38 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Montgomery, A A, Fahey, T (2001). How do patients' treatment preferences compare with those of clinicians?. Qual Saf Health Care 10: i39-43 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Rakow, T (2001). Differences in belief about likely outcomes account for differences in doctors' treatment preferences: but what accounts for the differences in belief?. Qual Saf Health Care 10: i44-49 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Ankum, W. M, Waard, M. W.-d., Bindels, P. J E (2001). Regular review: Management of spontaneous miscarriage in the first trimester: an example of putting informed shared decision making into practice. BMJ 322: 1343-1346 [Full text]  
  • Fahey, T., Montgomery, A. A., Peters, T. J., Tsuyuki, R. T., McAlister, F. A., Bungard, T. J., Ghali, W. A., Teo, K. K. (2000). Warfarin Therapy for Atrial Fibrillation: The Patient's Preference Is Important. Arch Intern Med 160: 2403-2403 [Full text]  
  • Penson, R. T., Gallagher, J., Gioiella, M. E., Wallace, M., Borden, K., Duska, L. A., Talcott, J. A., McGovern, F. J., Appleman, L. J., Chabner, B. A., Lynch, T. J. Jr. (2000). Sexuality and Cancer: Conversation Comfort Zone. The Oncologist 5: 336-344 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Charles, C., Gafni, A., Whelan, T. (2000). How to improve communication between doctors and patients. BMJ 320: 1220-1221 [Full text]  

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

A fourth model
Sydney Morss
bmj.com, 16 Feb 2000 [Full text]
Re: A fourth model
Ravindra Ruberu
bmj.com, 26 Dec 2008 [Full text]



Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student 

BMJ