Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Cathy Charles a Department of Clinical Epidemiology and
Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada L8N 3Z5, b Department of Medicine, McMaster
University
Correspondence to: C Charles charlesc@fhs.mcmaster.ca
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
For many decades, the dominant approach to making decisions
about treatment in the medical encounter has been one of
paternalism.1-7 In recent years this model has been
challenged by doctors, patients, medical ethicists, and researchers who
advocate more of a partnership relation between doctors and
patients.
2 8-13
The reasons for this challenge have been
described in detail elsewhere and include the rise of consumerism and
the notion of consumer sovereignty in healthcare decision making; the
women's movement with its emphasis on challenging medical authority;
the passage of legislation focusing on patients' rights in health
care; and small area variations in doctors' practice patterns that
seem unrelated to differences in health status.7 Though
the first three factors are seen as either contributors to or
facilitators of patients' participation in making decisions about
health care, the fourth highlights the imprecision or the "art" of
medical care14: patients with similar clinical problems
may
Read all Rapid Responses