Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Angela Towle a Faculty of
Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada V5Z 4E3, b Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of
British Columbia
Correspondence to: A Towle
atowle@interchange.ubc.ca
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
Patients should be involved in making decisions about their health care. The ethical imperative of autonomy is reflected in legal trends that require a high standard of disclosure for informed consent, amounting to a principle of informed choice.1-3 Outcomes of care and adherence to treatment regimens improve when patients are more involved. 4 5 Consumerism is part of the social spirit, and governments exhort citizens to take more responsibility.
Models of doctor-patient encounters that result in increased
involvement of patients and that are informed by good evidence have
been termed, for example, "informed patient
choice"6-8 but do not describe the interactive process
clearly. We use the term informed shared decision making to describe
decisions that are shared by doctor and patient and informed by best
evidence, not only about risks and benefits but also patient specific
characteristics and values. It occurs in a partnership that rests on
explicitly acknowledged rights and duties