BMJ 1999;319:578 ( 28 August )

Letters

Genealogy certainly matters for multifactorial genetic disease

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

EDITOR---We have some difficulties understanding Edwards's letter about the genetic mapping in Iceland.1 His first paragraph suggested that it was not about ethical or political issues, but the last paragraph was. His collaborations with some of our local critics who have been doing research on the genetics of schizophrenia may explain this.

What is clear, however, is that Edwards takes the rather narrow view that genealogical information is useful only for diseases that can be fitted with unifactorial models. We disagree. Data are the fuel of all scientific investigations, and in the case of genetic studies it is intuitively obvious that phenotypic, genetic, and genealogical data are all relevant. All methods for finding susceptibility genes with anonymous markers (even those that do not assume unifactorial aetiology) involve searching for genomic regions that patients share.

Apart from power considerations, one aspect that distinguishes the various approaches is resolution. For . . . [Full text of this article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

Unifactorial models are not appropriate for multifactorial disease
J H Edwards
BMJ 1999 318: 1353. [Extract] [Full Text]




Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student 

BMJ