Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITOR
We have some difficulties understanding Edwards's letter about
the genetic mapping in Iceland.1 His first paragraph suggested that it was not about ethical or political issues, but the
last paragraph was. His collaborations with some of our local critics
who have been doing research on the genetics of schizophrenia may
explain this.
What is clear, however, is that Edwards takes the rather narrow view that genealogical information is useful only for diseases that can be fitted with unifactorial models. We disagree. Data are the fuel of all scientific investigations, and in the case of genetic studies it is intuitively obvious that phenotypic, genetic, and genealogical data are all relevant. All methods for finding susceptibility genes with anonymous markers (even those that do not assume unifactorial aetiology) involve searching for genomic regions that patients share.
Apart from power considerations, one aspect that distinguishes the
various approaches is resolution. For